ADMIN: opinion needed

[Tom Wilson]

On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 15:11, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> The new mail server is up and functional. However, the upstream hasn't entered 
> the reverse DNS yet. Therefore, a decent number of servers will not accept 
> mail from it (some of you on this list are affected).
> The current mail server is listed as a 'Residential' IP, and therefore is 
> listed in several RBLs. Lots of people cannot currently receive mail from us.
> 
> There's the problem. Should we continue with the current RBL-listed server 
> until the upstream gets DNS sorted out (we have NO concrete ETA from them) or 
> should we switch servers now and let DNS catch up later?
> 
> Opinions to this thread. Poll ends Jan 13, 00:01 hours EST

I vote for let the DNS catch up. 

Tom Wilson 
McSwain Carpets 
513.771.1400 x124 
----- 
QOTD: "It's sort of a threat, you see. I've never been very good at them
myself, but I'm told they can be very effective."