[SBU Board] Vasa schdule--quick vote

[Ann Romeo]

1) I vote yes on a third session
2) I vote no on BAM and yes on Fast Pairs as third session

Ann

Ann Romeo
Personal email: annromeo at gmail.com
Local home: 206-526-0871
Work email: Ann.Romeo at ORCInternational.com
Work direct dial: 212-463-6331
My cell: 425-615-1413 (text ok)









On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:27 PM, JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry...let me be more explicit:
>
> 1) I vote no on a third session.
> 2) I vote no on BAM and FP for the third session, if it were to be run.
> (If we run a third session, I like Eric's choice pairs idea, although we
> can only run that for the open.)
>
>
> --
> JC Chupack
> Seattle ACBL Unit 446 <http://bridgeinseattle.org> Secretary, Electronic
> Contact, & Publicity Chair
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:25 PM, JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) I vote no on a third session.
>> 2) If we run a third session, I like Eric's choice pairs idea, although
>> we can only run that for the open.
>>
>> --
>> JC Chupack
>> Seattle ACBL Unit 446 <http://bridgeinseattle.org> Secretary, Electronic
>> Contact, & Publicity Chair
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Eric Sieg <easieg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 1) I vote yes on a 3rd session, at least this year. Then re-evaluate as
>>> to whether we want to have a 3rd session and whether we want to stick with
>>> Morning/Afternoon on Friday of the Sweetheart in the PM.
>>> 2) My primary thought is not a BAM.
>>>
>>> One possibility is a fast pairs that is run correctly. Alternatively, we
>>> could run Friday as a choice pairs where people pick 2 sessions to play.
>>> That way daytime people can play Morning/afternoon and working people could
>>> play afternoon/evening. I'm fine with either of these solutions and am not
>>> sure if choice pairs was brought up as an option during the meeting.
>>>
>>> For choice pairs, see section I at: https://www.acbl.org/about-acb
>>> l/administration/acbl-handbook/ii-kinds-of-event/
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>> Ann Romeo wrote:
>>>
>>> Reviewing the comments of the people who have weighed in (I believe we
>>> have not heard from Patti, Mike or Eric at this point), it seems that the
>>> majority are leaning toward not having a third session at Vasa  at our
>>> Sweetheart sectional.
>>>
>>> I would like to get a yea or nay from each of you, on the following:
>>>
>>> First, *should we have a third session at Vasa on Friday at our
>>> February sectional?  *
>>>
>>> Second, *if yes, should we have Fast Pairs?*
>>> or
>>> *Should we have single session BAM?*
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally, if we do not have a single session BAM, I will propose at our
>>> next meeting that we hold a single session BAM on the second session of the
>>> Friday of our KO tournament in May.
>>> ( we don't have to vote on that right now).
>>>
>>> Thanks for participating.
>>>
>>> Ann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ann Romeo
>>> Personal email: annromeo at gmail.com
>>> Local home: 206-526-0871
>>> Work email: Ann.Romeo at ORCInternational.com
>>> Work direct dial: 212-463-6331
>>> My cell: 425-615-1413 (text ok)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sbuboard mailing listSbuboard at mailman.celestial.comhttp://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sbuboard mailing list
>>> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
>>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sbuboard mailing list
> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20180910/2fe9d83a/attachment.html>