[SBU Board] Vasa schdule--quick vote

[JC Chupack]

Sorry...let me be more explicit:

1) I vote no on a third session.
2) I vote no on BAM and FP for the third session, if it were to be run. (If
we run a third session, I like Eric's choice pairs idea, although we can
only run that for the open.)


--
JC Chupack
Seattle ACBL Unit 446 <http://bridgeinseattle.org> Secretary, Electronic
Contact, & Publicity Chair

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:25 PM, JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) I vote no on a third session.
> 2) If we run a third session, I like Eric's choice pairs idea, although we
> can only run that for the open.
>
> --
> JC Chupack
> Seattle ACBL Unit 446 <http://bridgeinseattle.org> Secretary, Electronic
> Contact, & Publicity Chair
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Eric Sieg <easieg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) I vote yes on a 3rd session, at least this year. Then re-evaluate as
>> to whether we want to have a 3rd session and whether we want to stick with
>> Morning/Afternoon on Friday of the Sweetheart in the PM.
>> 2) My primary thought is not a BAM.
>>
>> One possibility is a fast pairs that is run correctly. Alternatively, we
>> could run Friday as a choice pairs where people pick 2 sessions to play.
>> That way daytime people can play Morning/afternoon and working people could
>> play afternoon/evening. I'm fine with either of these solutions and am not
>> sure if choice pairs was brought up as an option during the meeting.
>>
>> For choice pairs, see section I at: https://www.acbl.org/about-acb
>> l/administration/acbl-handbook/ii-kinds-of-event/
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>> Ann Romeo wrote:
>>
>> Reviewing the comments of the people who have weighed in (I believe we
>> have not heard from Patti, Mike or Eric at this point), it seems that the
>> majority are leaning toward not having a third session at Vasa  at our
>> Sweetheart sectional.
>>
>> I would like to get a yea or nay from each of you, on the following:
>>
>> First, *should we have a third session at Vasa on Friday at our February
>> sectional?  *
>>
>> Second, *if yes, should we have Fast Pairs?*
>> or
>> *Should we have single session BAM?*
>>
>>
>> Finally, if we do not have a single session BAM, I will propose at our
>> next meeting that we hold a single session BAM on the second session of the
>> Friday of our KO tournament in May.
>> ( we don't have to vote on that right now).
>>
>> Thanks for participating.
>>
>> Ann
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ann Romeo
>> Personal email: annromeo at gmail.com
>> Local home: 206-526-0871
>> Work email: Ann.Romeo at ORCInternational.com
>> Work direct dial: 212-463-6331
>> My cell: 425-615-1413 (text ok)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbuboard mailing listSbuboard at mailman.celestial.comhttp://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbuboard mailing list
>> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20180910/d28b8a11/attachment-0001.html>