[SBU Board] Monday’s Agenda

[JC Chupack]

One more thing to add to my comments below that I forgot to mention...I
always include our DIC on the submission to the ACBL, as a courtesy and to
provide them an opportunity for direct feedback.  It's not officially a
step we're required to take or get, but I've done it with every flyer I've
made for us, largely because my predecessor did it and it seems like the
right thing to do. :)

--
JC Chupack
Seattle ACBL Unit 446 Secretary, Electronic Contact, & Publicity Chair
http://bridgeinseattle.org


On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:14 PM, JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Part of the ACBL's process for the flyer getting approved for our
> distribution is review by the head director for the unit/district. Thus, no
> flyer goes out with directorial approval. (How much attention is actually
> paid in that process may be a wholly separate issue, but that is the
> intended step for directors to raise concerns about tournament schedules
> prior to distribution.)
>
> We have, in the past, when making significant changes to tournament
> formats or schedules (including but not limited to the changes that were
> outcomes of the tournaments comm & survey, like adding 0-750 sessions and
> changing strats), run those changes by our local directors and/or the
> appropriate DIC to get feedback before making the change, at the board's
> determination and discretion.
>
> Generally speaking, I'm not sure it makes sense to run a schedule by the
> DIC until the board has actually reviewed that schedule.  In the past, what
> we've done is if there's some proposed change or schedule issue that the
> board is concerned about, we hold board approval contingent on DIC
> approval. If we want to have a draft that the board agrees on, then a DIC
> review, then a board approval cycle, that's going to change the publicity
> schedule for the year pretty significantly, but if that's desired, we can
> figure it out.
>
> JC
>
> --
> JC Chupack
> Seattle ACBL Unit 446 Secretary, Electronic Contact, & Publicity Chair
> http://bridgeinseattle.org
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Monty Gray <mlgrayjr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If we haven’t already done so, could we solicit comments from the
>> directors before we’re asked to give approval?  Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Monty Gray
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com>
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 2, 2018 5:21 PM
>> *To: *Seattle ACBL Unit Board <sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [SBU Board] Monday’s Agenda
>>
>>
>>
>> Please also make sure to include an item for reviewing the Suntan
>> Sectional flyer. I'll bring printouts and send drafts in advance.
>>
>>
>> --
>> JC Chupack
>>
>> * Find me on Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, or Twitter: jcchupack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Tim White <trkwhite at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ann,
>> Please add an item for me to report out on the D19 board meeting that
>> took place today in Burnaby.
>> Thx,
>> Tim
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbuboard mailing list
>> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbuboard mailing list
>> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20180405/8942aa18/attachment-0001.html>