[SBU Board] KO Sectional Post Mortem

[Tim White]

Yes Eric, I heard much the same several times.  199er's very seldom elect to play two sessions of their own Swiss (there's never enough for a 2nd 0-200 Swiss), and they seem to prefer the morning for one session of 0-200 Swiss play.

Tim


On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Eric Sieg <easieg at gmail.com> wrote:

> That reminds me of one of Jenni's points: we don't generally want to have a 2nd 0-200 single session swiss since it never makes. The suggestion was to just have one and fold people who want to play 2 sessions into the main swiss to begin with. 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:05 AM, William Campbell <jwccsllc at me.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Raymond Miller <raysmiller at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I am one of the passionate small core group that loves the BAM.  However , as a board member, it is not my job to support an event that is clearly losing interest.  Those attendance figures tell a big story, and I can only see them dropping further after this weekend.  I have talked with many players, some of whom did not attend the event on Monday, specifically because it was board-a-match.  The general consensus I have been hearing, is "we would have played Swiss".  
>> 
>> So I conclude that this event has run its course.  I can't think of any good reasons to continue it for now.  I will support retiring the event and putting the Swiss back in place.  To quote one member of the unit "A tournament without a 2 session Swiss is unacceptable".  
> 
>> As for Fast Pairs, as an alternative for people who don't want to play Swiss, maybe. but can we really support to events? As a replacement for Swiss, I think this would be highly unpopular.  The 2 session Swiss is an event that many expect to see on our schedule.  
> 
> This makes sense to me.  My only question is why are there 2 single-session 0-200 Swiss instead of a 2-session event?
> 
> I agree that the start times for Saturday and Sunday should have been earlier, perhaps even morning/afternoon rather than afternoon/evening as there are many people who don't like driving after dark.
> 
> I don't like leaving out the 0-200 pairs game, folding them into the 0-750.  A stratified 0-200 game gives the newcomer a better chance of getting some Masterpoints, and perhaps not feeling intimidated playing against stronger players.  My wife was very happy to win the 0-5 bracket of an I/N game at the last Atlanta NABC getting a section top trophy.  About 45% of the Unit members are in the 0-200 bracket, 25% in the 200-750, and 30% over 750.  I don't know how this breaks out for members who play in Sectionals now, but I would guess that fewer of the 0-200 players are playing tournaments.  I do know that the Friday morning games at Eastside, the 0-200 section is usually larger then the Open (thanks Alan Tesler :-).
> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sbuboard mailing list
> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sbuboard mailing list
> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20170601/675f5c9a/attachment.html>