Fedora 10

[Ken Moffat]

Collins Richey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com> wrote:
>   
>> Fedora 10 isn't bad.
>>
>> NetworkManager, on the other hand, is a steaming turd. It would take
>> some effort, but I'm sure if the GNOME developers work hard enough,
>> they can make NetworkManager completely incapable of customization
>> or end-user configuration.
>>
>>     
>
> NM was just one of the reasons I gave up on Ubuntu, and now Fedora as
> well has fallen for this POS! BTW, I thought the goal of GNOME
> developers was to render everything completely incapable of
> customization or end-user configuration. Oops, my KDE prejudice is
> showing again.
>
>   

I have no idea what possible use there is for NM. I remove it as soon as 
I install Debian or Ubuntu. It seems to be nothing but in the way. Are 
there any positives? Maybe if you know nothing and use dynamic ip 
addresses, and move from network to network?

-- 

Ken

kmoffat at drizzle.com