Alternatives that don´t suck?

Collins Richey crichey at gmail.com
Sun Aug 10 13:19:38 PDT 2008


Excerpt from ¨LDAP server broken after upgrade¨.

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama at gmail.com> wrote

< I'm rapidly reaching the point of wanting to ditch Fedora, if only all
< the alternatives didn't suck more  :P

So, I´m curious. What would be the criteria for an alternative that
wouldn´t suck?

In running Fedora, you´ve by definition expressed a preference for
bleeding edge packages, and those are frequently broken (if only for a
few days).

Are we talking about servers or desktops?

If it´s servers, I´m quite sure CentOS or Debian stable or even Debian
testing (as Mr.
Bandel can testify) would suck considerably less. If it´s desktop,
there are any number of candidates. The Debian sid (also bleeding
edge) that I´m running only has about 3 serious hits per year, but you
wouldn´t want to try this on a server.

Please quantify.

-- 
Collins Richey
 If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries
 of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.




More information about the Linux-users mailing list