Alternatives that don´t suck?
Collins Richey
crichey at gmail.com
Sun Aug 10 13:19:38 PDT 2008
Excerpt from ¨LDAP server broken after upgrade¨.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama at gmail.com> wrote
< I'm rapidly reaching the point of wanting to ditch Fedora, if only all
< the alternatives didn't suck more :P
So, I´m curious. What would be the criteria for an alternative that
wouldn´t suck?
In running Fedora, you´ve by definition expressed a preference for
bleeding edge packages, and those are frequently broken (if only for a
few days).
Are we talking about servers or desktops?
If it´s servers, I´m quite sure CentOS or Debian stable or even Debian
testing (as Mr.
Bandel can testify) would suck considerably less. If it´s desktop,
there are any number of candidates. The Debian sid (also bleeding
edge) that I´m running only has about 3 serious hits per year, but you
wouldn´t want to try this on a server.
Please quantify.
--
Collins Richey
If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries
of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list