LCD Optical Illusion?
Michael Hipp
Michael
Wed Jul 4 11:56:46 PDT 2007
Leon Goldstein wrote:
> I finally bought a LCD monitor. It's a Xerox XG 92D 19" standard aspect
> ratio (1280 x 1024.)
> I went for this particular display because it renders text as clearly
> and sharply as my CRT's.
> And apparently the only reason this LCD monitor beats out the others is
> because it has a glass plate over the LCD.
>
> While browsing monitors a few weeks ago I noticed that some HP wide
> screen displays seemed to be a lot sharper* than what I've been seeing
> over the last few years. According to the sales rep, the "secret" is
> the glossy surface of the HP's LCD.
> Curious, since I always assumed it had more to due with contrast ratio,
> I asked to have the Xerox, which was on the clearance shelf, plugged in
> to examine the glossy screen surface hypothesis. I like what I saw and
> told him to wrap it up.
>
> I considered the HP's, but since my main use is text processing, a wide
> screen display would be more of a hindrance than an asset. I am looking
> to get another LCD. The Xerox I bought had one stuck pixel out of the
> box, and googling reveals less than an enthusiastic opinion about
> Xerox's tech and warranty support. Are there any other LCD monitors
> with a glass plate?
>
> *By "sharper" I mean the text character does not appear to be a bit out
> of focus or have a shadow.
Dunno the answer to your question.
But I'd recommend you be sure you really like the glossy screens. They
have one *severe* drawback: GLARE. They reflect everything.
I wouldn't have one at any price for that reason. Can you say
M-I-G-R-A-I-N-E?
Since you do text processing - which prefers "portrait" to
landscape/wide-screen - you might want to look into a monitor that
rotates 90%. My ViewSonic does that tho I never use it as my coding
seems to go better in landscape mode.
Michael
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list