Spammed

[Net Llama!]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006, Net Llama! wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Net Llama! wrote:
>>>
>>>> This list doesn't generate a response to rejected mail, explicitly for the
>>>> purpose of not providing spammer's with notification of receipt of their
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>> I know that not replying to spammers is good practice for individuals,
>>> but does it apply to non-open lists?
>>
>> I dont' see how it would hurt.
>
> It would help legitimate members who posted from a system that
> didn't set the correct address.
>
> When I send mail to this list using mutt, I have mutt_hooks set
> to generate the address linux-sxs at celestial.com.  If I were to

Is that why all your Reply-To's are b0rked?  You're the only one on this 
list who ends up with that address in the Reply-to.

> Given that I might forget all this, I would find it useful to be
> reminded that I screwed up.

Once the spam dies down, we can turn it back on.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama at linux-sxs.org
LlamaLand				http://netllama.linux-sxs.org