Fedora Core 5 + Athlon 64 + Nvidia Motherboard
Rick Sivernell
res005ru
Sat May 13 15:59:09 PDT 2006
On Sat, 13 May 2006 09:49:20 +0800
Chong Yu Meng <chongym at cymulacrum.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 10:27 -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
> > >
> > > > Specifically which MSI board are you considering?
> > > >
> > >
> > > MSI K8MM-V (Socket 754)
> > > (http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=647) for my development system. If all goes well, I may decide to use an AMD64 motherboard for the server I am planning to deploy in HK.
> >
> > This isn't an nForce chipset board, its VIA.
> >
> Hmm... that's embarassing ! I didn't have a close look at it until just
> now. I thought all AMD boards had Nvidia chipsets, but it looks like Via
> and ATI are all getting in and producing their own AMD boards as well.
>
> It took me a while, but I finally found another board, this time with
> the Nvidia chipset (and it looks awfully small):
> http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=702
>
>
> And it fits within my budget too!
>
> --
> Pascal Chong
> email: chongym at cymulacrum.net
> web: http://cymulacrum.net
>
> "We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming."
> -- Wernher von Braun
>
I am running a Asus K8n_E delux with 2 gig, 3 g max, with FC4. I love
it. AMD54 3400+. Running MSI on Win2k server, soon to be 2003 server wit
2 g memory and aAMD64 3000+. Slick on both. Both are NVidia chipsets
with NVidia 5500 video cards.
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
ricksivernell at verizon.net
Registered Linux User
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list