2.6 ready?

[Kurt Wall]

In a 0.8K blaze of typing glory, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 04/03/04 19:07, Shawn Tayler wrote:
> 
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >I remember some months back there was discussion on the stability of the
> >2.6 kernel.  I was wondering if there are any recent opinions?
> 
> I'm running 2.6.x on most of my desktop boxes, and its been ok.  I'm 
> prolly going to wait until 2.6.10 before putting it on any production boxes.

Why .10 as opposed to, say, .9 or .11? Not that it is any of my business,
it just seemed an arbitrary choice.

Kurt
-- 
... at least I thought I was dancing, 'til somebody stepped on my hand.
		-- J. B. White