SO refusing to start
Net Llama!
netllama
Mon May 17 11:59:15 PDT 2004
On 02/09/04 18:18, Joel Hammer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:16:21PM +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
>
>>I get 15 seconds until the progress box shows, and then an additional 20
>>seconds until the editor is up. This when running KDE and Evolution at
>>the same time on:
>>
>> 1.4 GHz P4 with 256 MB RAM and oddles of swap.
>>
>>The start a second time takes 15 seconds.
>>
>>Oddly, all my windows seems to be slow to start lately. It is not a DNS
>>thing (as I can see) as I can resolve an address immediately. I suspect
>>too little RAM. But the slowness did not come about after any obvious
>>upgrade. This is on an up-to-date Gentoo system. No funny optimizations.j
>>My wife is starting to make snide remarks...
>
>
>
> With SO 7, a cold start is 10 secs, a repeat start is
> 6 secs.
>
> I have a cheap Duron 1 GHz with 645 megs. (Memory is cheap
How do you get 645MB of RAM? RAM is usually in powers of 2.
> these days.)
>
> Is is possible that all that swap memory is slowing
> things down?
All of what swap memory? What does free show you?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
18:40:01 up 64 days, 23:22, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.03
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list