Gimp Revisited

[Joel Hammer]

I use 1.3.

Gimp may be capable but it's much less intuitive. Layers
for example. Very simple in photoshop.

Another example is color correction.  This is when you take
a picture and have the wrong white balance. In photoshop
this is so simple to fix it's hardly worth talking about. I
still don't know how to do that in gimp. I am sure it can
be done but I don't have the time to search the various
tools/dialogs/scripts with their numerous confusing options
for the answer.

I have never read anything but the menus in photoshop.

I could go on but I don't have my flame suit handy.

Joel


On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 07:11:19AM +0100, Javier Hernandez wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> > For those of you involved in the Gimp/Photoshop critique, I'd be interested in what version of the Gimp you have used.  I just started 1.3 and it is a total breath of fresh air over 1.2.
> >
> > So if you could reply to this email, including:
> > * Version in use
> 
> Just 1.2.1 (I only use it from time to time).
> 
> Now that you mentioned version 1.3 I would probably test that one.
> :)
> 
> > * Opinion of Gimp (worst 1 - 10 best)
> 
> Quite useful most of the time: 9
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> Javi,         _____           fjherna at europa3.com
>                 |             http://www.europa3.com/users/fjherna/
>      \_____(X)_(_)_(X)_____/  http://www.valux.org/
> ____________!___!___!_________Valencia(Spain)
> ===================================================================
> Excellent time to become a missing person.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users at smtp.linux-sxs.org
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users