FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

[Collins Richey]

Interesting article and lots of critiques at

	http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715

The following extract shows the basic differences.  This is German
number notation with commas and periods reversed.

             reiser4       reiserfs       ext3           XFS         JFS
copy     33.39,34%  39.55,32%  39.42,25%  43.50,32%  48.15,20%
sync        1.54,00%   3.15,10%   9.05,00%    2.08,10%    3.05,10%
recopy1  31.09,34%  75.15,13%  79.96, 9% 102.37,12% 108.39, 5%
recopy2  33.15,33%  77.62,13%  98.84, 7% 108.00,12% 114.96, 5%
sync      2.89, 3%   3.84, 1%   8.15, 0%   2.40, 2%   3.86, 0%
du        2.05,42%   2.46,21%   3.31,11%   3.73,32%   2.42,17%
delete    7.41,52%   5.22,58%   3.71,39%   8.75,56%  15.33, 7%
tar      52.25,25%  90.83,12%  74.93,13% 157.61, 7% 135.86, 6%
sync      6.77, 2%   4.19, 3%   1.67, 1%   0.95, 1%  38.18, 0%
overall 171.28,30% 302.53,16% 319.71,11% 429.79,13% 470.88, 6%

In general, reiser4 looks to be a real winner (when it's out of
development, of course), and my favorite EXT3 and everyone else's
favorite XFS are among the slowest.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.