XFS resizing & Win2k

[ronnie gauthier]

I dont know about 2k but the other not NT versions have to be, I think win calls
it "first active partition" or some such, but I think you can set that when you
partition. But I recall installing windows98 on the second drive of a box once,
but again, I had to set the partiton to active. FWIW

On Thu, 29 May 2003 15:18:24 -0400 (EDT) - Net Llama! <netllama at linux-sxs.org>
wrote the following
Re: Re: XFS resizing & Win2k

>On Thu, 29 May 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote:
>> | ugh.  oh well, i guess i'll give it a whirl.  thanks.
>> |
>> | Anyone know if Win2k has any ridiculous need to be on hda1, or will it be
>> | ok sitting on hda4?
>> |
>>
>> No, it needs to be on C:\ <slap>
>
>Seriously, does win2k need to be on the first partition of the primary
>master IDE channel?  I don't want to go through all of this to find out
>that win2k won't fly.
>
>-- 
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
>Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-users mailing list
>Linux-users at linux-sxs.org
>Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
>http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users