the irony is so thick . . .
Collins Richey
erichey2
Mon May 17 11:47:32 PDT 2004
On Sun, 18 May 2003 21:03:05 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <david at pananix.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2003 18:24:58 -0400
> dep <dep at linuxandmain.com> wrote:
>
> > begin Net Llama!'s quote:
> > | they prolly canned the admin for the server months ago.
> >
> > esr tells me that the gpl requires them to keep it available for
> > three
> >
> > years. now, it's interesting that they would use *that* rationale,
> > if they did; perhaps they do not care to have the fsf take them on
> > just now. perhaps they believe that they can take out the gpl in the
> > ibm suit -- it's certainly mentioned.
> >
> > it's puzzling, no matter how you cut it.
>
> it gets a bit thicker. I can?t say much more than what I?m about to
> say-- but I have a (former) inside source that tells me:
>
> The Canopy Group is one entity
> Caldera is another entity under the Canopy Group
> SCO is yet another group, supposedly under the Caldera and the Canopy
> Group, but seemingly with a mind (just not one with any intelligence)
> of its own.
> The name ?The SCO Group? being used currently isn?t official because
> it hasn?t been blessed by anyone (especially the shareholders who have
> to vote on this name change).
>
> It gets a lot thicker than the above, but basically, neither the
> Canopy Group nor Caldera benefit from the current ?SCO Group? suicide
> run. Why the brakes haven?t been applied yet, I don?t know. But
> obviously something is out of control.
>
> Ciao,
>
> David A. Bandel
> --
> Focus on the dream, not the competition.
> Nemesis Racing Team motto
> GPG key autoresponder: mailto:david_key at pananix.com
>
I think Dep has it right, and I said so a few days earlier, only someone
with the deep pockets and lack of morals like Redmond could have
concocted this fsck'n mess.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
gentoo stable - ext3
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list