suse 8.2 networking

[Net Llama!]

On 04/25/03 15:37, dep wrote:
> On Friday 25 April 2003 06:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> | On 04/25/03 15:07, dep wrote:
> | > On Friday 25 April 2003 04:36 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> | > | On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, dep wrote:
> | > | > this is nuts.
> | > | >
> | > | > i spent the better part of two days trying to get the nvidia
> | > | > driver
> | > |
> | > | [SNIP]
> | > |
> | > | Just curious.  If you're going through such hell with SuSE, why
> | > | don't you use something else?
> | >
> | > because everything else is worse. i mean, it might be easier to
> | > install, but then it's what you end up with. if ease of
> | > installation were the sole determinant, we'd all be running dos
> | > and windows 3.0.
> |
> | at the risk of starting a distro war, there's no conceivable way
> | that Redhat is worse.  I've never had any of the problems that
> | you've been describing on Redhat (7.2, 7.3 or 9).  Have you
> | actually tried any other alternatives (recently)?
> 
> when you install red hat, the install may well go smoothly, but 
> unfortunately you end up with red hat.

exactly.  you don't hear me complaining about cryptic configuration 
tools, broken networking, and misplaced files.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                       	       netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: 		    http://netllama.ipfox.com

   3:45pm  up 47 days, 15:12,  3 users,  load average: 0.07, 0.11, 0.16