suse 8.2 networking

[Michael Scottaline]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:37:50 -0400
dep <dep at linuxandmain.com> insightfully noted:

>On Friday 25 April 2003 06:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
>| On 04/25/03 15:07, dep wrote:
>| > On Friday 25 April 2003 04:36 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
>| > | On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, dep wrote:
>| > | > this is nuts.
>| > | >
>| > | > i spent the better part of two days trying to get the nvidia
>| > | > driver
>| > |
>| > | [SNIP]
>| > |
>| > | Just curious.  If you're going through such hell with SuSE, why
>| > | don't you use something else?
>| >
>| > because everything else is worse. i mean, it might be easier to
>| > install, but then it's what you end up with. if ease of
>| > installation were the sole determinant, we'd all be running dos
>| > and windows 3.0.
>|
>| at the risk of starting a distro war, there's no conceivable way
>| that Redhat is worse.  I've never had any of the problems that
>| you've been describing on Redhat (7.2, 7.3 or 9).  Have you
>| actually tried any other alternatives (recently)?
>
>when you install red hat, the install may well go smoothly, but 
>unfortunately you end up with red hat.
=================================
Oh-oh......, is this the old /opt v. /usr/local controversy?? ;o)
<shrug> RH works just fine for me; So has mandrake, the old Caldera, and even
Debian.  Haven't yet tried Slack, SuSE or any of the others.
Mike

-- 
"The man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 
years of his life"
--Muhammad Ali