Gnucash: Opinions please

Tim Wunder tim
Mon May 17 11:45:30 PDT 2004


On 3/13/2003 8:42 AM, someone claiming to be Tom Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 08:03, Tim Wunder wrote:
> 
>>In fairness to Lindows, gnucash 1.8.0 was just released in February. 
>>It's currently at 1.8.2, and some things are broken still (not badly 
>>broken, but broken none-the-less). Scheduled Transactions being one of 
>>the broken features. They work, mostly, and I use them heavily (I've 
>>been using gnucash from CVS for months, specifically for the SX's), but 
>>there's a minor problem with the transactions not being exactly valid. 
>>And SX's don't work with the Postgres backend, yet (but the pg backend 
>>is not the default and you need to jump thru some hoops to get it to work).
> 
> 
> Is there a way to get Gnucash to function without the double
> accounting?  I liked the earlier version before they went to double
> entry but I can't get them to install on my box.
> 

No, double-entry accounting is pretty much the main feature of gnucash. 
What is it that you don't like about it?

Tim



More information about the Linux-users mailing list