Gnucash: Opinions please
Tim Wunder
tim
Mon May 17 11:45:30 PDT 2004
On 3/13/2003 8:42 AM, someone claiming to be Tom Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 08:03, Tim Wunder wrote:
>
>>In fairness to Lindows, gnucash 1.8.0 was just released in February.
>>It's currently at 1.8.2, and some things are broken still (not badly
>>broken, but broken none-the-less). Scheduled Transactions being one of
>>the broken features. They work, mostly, and I use them heavily (I've
>>been using gnucash from CVS for months, specifically for the SX's), but
>>there's a minor problem with the transactions not being exactly valid.
>>And SX's don't work with the Postgres backend, yet (but the pg backend
>>is not the default and you need to jump thru some hoops to get it to work).
>
>
> Is there a way to get Gnucash to function without the double
> accounting? I liked the earlier version before they went to double
> entry but I can't get them to install on my box.
>
No, double-entry accounting is pretty much the main feature of gnucash.
What is it that you don't like about it?
Tim
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list