wireless question
dep
dep
Mon May 17 11:43:35 PDT 2004
begin David A. Bandel's quote:
| Understand a wireless access device (a residential gateway, access
| point, whatever) will carry an IP so you can manage it, but it's a
| pure bridge -- just a way to pass from wireless to wired. DHCP
| will pass right through.
this gives me an opportunity to regale you with a description of my
last few hours.
first, i believe that any networking documentation should be oriented
more toward the real world. illustrations should involve things like
cobwebs, and perhaps a comical picture of a fellow about a tenth of a
second after he discovers quite by accident that that pipe whose hole
he is using to get the cable to the floor above carries *HOT!* water.
it should describe useful tools, the essential of which is the
straightened coat hanger, and it should provide instructions for
using electrician's tape to make a nice nose cone in front of the
connector itself, the design of which is being studied by the makers
of fishhooks and anchors. (as an aside, there should be a note
pointing out that the rj-45 connector has won awards for requiring
the biggest possible hole.) but this is preamble, and in that we
already had band-aids i was able to string the wire upstairs in under
90 minutes.
i plugged everything in and the lights came on. i had availed myself
of what was cheapest, which turned out to be a d-link access point
(the gateway/firewall/nat/dhcp box is a one-in, one-out d-link, as is
the eight-port hub, so i thought this was good -- less likelihood of
trouble with the same brand). the instructions said i was then to go
to http://192.168.0.50 and run the setup wizard. this was
problematic, in that the internal page seems unfriendly to any
browser i have aboard -- the closest that came to working was an old
netscape, which was able to do everything except "save settings." but
by now there were other problems.
i now had no internet. none at all. given the state of the union and
so on, i figured that we were undergoing another internet shitstorm,
so i phoned a friend to inquire if he had internet service. yup.
i disconnected the access point from the hub. no joy. tried to ping
the gateway. no joy. checked all the wires to make sure i hadn't
knocked something loose. wires were fine. ran route -- got no route.
rebooted computer and was told that it had been 192 days since fsck
had run -- of course. still no internet.
phoned d-link to ask 'em what their access point had done to my
network. got somebody who didn't seem to know a lot, but who did say
that i should have disregarded the stuff about http://192.168.0.50.
in that their "quick installation guide" is devoted entirely to doing
things at that address, i cannot imagine what possessed me to do it.
after 45 minutes or so of trying various things that i had already
done -- ifconfig, route, ping -- he put me on hold. while i was on
hold, i thought to recycle the power to the gateway thing, to reboot
it. i did so.
after which i had the internet just fine. i had put the ultra-cheap
belkin 802.11b pcmcia card in susan's machine; not i went up, opened
the browser, and up came the web.
guy from d-link came back on; i told him how to solve the problem if
it comes up again. he said thanks.
anyway, it all works. i haven't tested the range of the thing -- we're
in the middle of five acres -- but i hope that it will extend
throughout the house and yard. reason i strung the wire upstairs is
that my office is in the basement, and it seemed to me that this
might limit the range somewhat.
and yes, the access point passes through dhcp just fine. though that
hellish setup utility offers to make it the dhcp server.
so we have moved into the closing years of the 20th century around
here!
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list