ext3 Bug in 2.4.20

[Jerry McBride]

On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 21:28:53 -0500 "Brett I. Holcomb" <bholcomb at intergate.com>
wrote:

> 
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
> >> On 12/03/02 16:23, kwall at kurtwerks.com wrote:
> > 
> > Okay, now we're down to cases. ext3 is not immune to data loss, but it is
> > far less so than ext2. I don't have a terrabyte raid array to worry about,
> > so a "stupid time-consuming fsck" takes, oh, 10 minutes. Despite the
> 
> Is ext3 faster than ext2? 

No... same for XFS. ANY linux journaling fs will be slower than ext2...


-- 

******************************************************************************
                     Registered Linux User Number 185956
          http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
             Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
    10:05pm  up 10 days, 23:48,  3 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00