ext3 Bug in 2.4.20

[kwall@kurtwerks.com]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:28:53PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
> >> On 12/03/02 16:23, kwall at kurtwerks.com wrote:
> > 
> > Okay, now we're down to cases. ext3 is not immune to data loss, but it is
> > far less so than ext2. I don't have a terrabyte raid array to worry about,
> > so a "stupid time-consuming fsck" takes, oh, 10 minutes. Despite the
> 
> Is ext3 faster than ext2?  I have a 36gig drive the when the "mount count 
> exceded" time comes up it takes 15-20 minutes to check but it's ext2.

Not that I know of. There are some benchmark tests you can do, but I
wouldn't expect to see much difference in terms of I/O performance. 
I don't know about recovery (fsck) time.

Kurt
-- 
Nothing recedes like success.
		-- Walter Winchell