ext3 Bug in 2.4.20

[kwall@kurtwerks.com]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:12:18PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 12/03/02 15:19, kwall at kurtwerks.com wrote:

[le whackety]

> >Now, if Red Hat is pushing ext3 as an "enterprise ready solution," they
> >should know better than to believe their own marketing material. ;-)
> >XFS or JFS (or AFS) are far better and more suitable for The Enterprise
> >(c). 
> 
> I'm not talking specifically about Redhat.  Name one major distro that 
> didn't ship ext3 as their first journaling FS.  Oh yea, SCOdera did push 
> Reiser early on.  I've just had countless problems with ext3, and zero 
> with XFS.

SuSE, too (I see Aaron pointed this out, too). You might push ext3 harder 
than I do. I have nothing against XFS; it's a superior solution. I'm here
at ext3, though, it ain't broken, so I don't feel the need to fix it.

[le clippety]

K
-- 
I've enjoyed just about as much of this as I can stand.