<OT> Re: we shall remember them

[ronnie gauthier]

Yes, it did.
International majority opinion does not have a gun at its head, we do.
If a nuclear weapon is going to go bang it's a 101% bet it will be in
DC|NY|LA or somewhere where millions are going to die.
OTOH, the "international majority", has a great incentive to keep "us"
in the spotlight. While all terrorists are concentrating on bringing
down the "great capitalistic christian pig of the United States" all the
"international majority" has to do is to shut up and not bring
attention to themselves by siding with the US and maybe the radical
islamics will leave them alone. Maybe when the dust settles the world
will be better but lets ride the fence, annoy no one that will
retaliate and when its over we will congratulate the winner.
And if you think for  a minute that chicken shit countries egg laying
leaders dont talk about the very exact thing behind closed doors... and
the next time those countries get in trouble maybe the US should develop
a "Continental type morality" then sit back and say "not today
'enry|ivan|fritz| fight abdulla|whoever yourself, we have a baseball
game to watch. Maybe if they kill a million of you we will consider
discussing your unfortunate situation but until then...batter up!"


On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:17:14 -0700
"Net Llama!" <netllama at linux-sxs.org> wrote:

>That's a beautiful analogy, however it doesn't address anything i've 
>said.  I'm not debating, nor am i denying that Saddam is a nut job. 
>What I am saying is that the US govt's reasoning for thumbing its nose 
>at international majority opinion is flawed & hypocritical.
>
>On 10/20/02 11:24, ronnie gauthier wrote:
>
>> uhh.
>> how about this.
>> I'm your asshole neighbor. We hate each other. You are stronger than
>> me. I am far crazier than you. You are scared of my unpredicability.
>> You have a very nice field of hay that you sell for a living. In our