glibc-2.2.5

[m.w.chang]

yeah, i am afraid so... haha....I guess after uprading glibc, one must 
at least compile a few packages to double-check the process. I didn't 
know that.... :)

/lib/cpp failed sanity check.... what the freak is it?... I DON'T want 
to buy another distribiton because something that could be done myself. 
kernel 2.2.x to 2.4.x may be a wide gap (involving over 10 packages), 
gilbc-2.2.1 to glibc-2.2.5 shouldn't be a big issue.

> I was replying to chang. Since he was upgrading glibc on a eW3.1 box and 
> was claiming success, I really wanted to know if his success was really 
> what he thought it was. It seems, though, from a subsequent post by him, 
> he may be embarking upon the same path to glibc hell that I've been on.

-- 
  Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly.  .~.   In Linux we trust.
                                / v \
  news://news.hkpcug.org       /( _ )\  http://www.linux-sxs.org
                                 ^ ^