unitedlinux: it gets weirder
Keith Antoine
kantoine
Mon May 17 11:32:22 PDT 2004
On Friday 31 May 2002 04:18 am, you wrote:
> begin Tim Wunder's quote:
> | The way I read it is that one of the differentiating factors left
> | to the distributions was the development of the desktop and which
> | apps would be installed. UnitedLinux would provide the base. End
> | user (desktop) apps would be add-ons provided by the individual
> | distros in the manner in which they see fit. So, Skippy Linux could
> | be "Powered by UnitedLinux" and contain all the desktop goodies
> | that he'd want for his distro. Regards,
>
> no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop distro
> *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand.
However I would presume that the release rpms will in fact work with say
Caldera 3.1/3.1.1 and Lycoris. The big bugbear with me was the lack of
updates to Caldera versions coupled with the difficulty of compiling some of
the more difficult progs.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list