unitedlinux: it gets weirder
Brett I. Holcomb
bholcomb
Mon May 17 11:32:13 PDT 2004
Management never does things that make sense!
Tim Wunder wrote:
> On 5/30/2002 2:18 PM, someone claiming to be dep wrote:
>> begin Tim Wunder's quote:
>> | The way I read it is that one of the differentiating factors left
>> | to the distributions was the development of the desktop and which
>> | apps would be installed. UnitedLinux would provide the base. End
>> | user (desktop) apps would be add-ons provided by the individual
>> | distros in the manner in which they see fit. So, Skippy Linux could
>> | be "Powered by UnitedLinux" and contain all the desktop goodies
>> | that he'd want for his distro. Regards,
>>
>> no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop distro
>> *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand.
>
> Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and it appears
> that you're right. But...Well...that just doesn't make any sense...
--
Brett I. Holcomb
bholcomb at R777cableone.net
AKA Grunt <><
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list