unitedlinux: it gets weirder

[Tim Wunder]

On 5/30/2002 2:18 PM, someone claiming to be dep wrote:
> begin  Tim Wunder's  quote:
> | The way I read it is that one of the differentiating factors left
> | to the distributions was the development of the desktop and which
> | apps would be installed. UnitedLinux would provide the base. End
> | user (desktop) apps would be add-ons provided by the individual
> | distros in the manner in which they see fit. So, Skippy Linux could
> | be "Powered by UnitedLinux" and contain all the desktop goodies
> | that he'd want for his distro. Regards,
> 
> no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop distro 
> *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand.

Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and it appears that you're right. But...Well...that just doesn't make any sense...