compiling a 2.6.x kernel
Kurt Wall
kwall
Mon Aug 16 22:55:58 PDT 2004
In a 1.2K blaze of typing glory, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 08/16/2004 08:04 PM, Kurt Wall wrote:
> >In a 0.6K blaze of typing glory, M.W. Chang wrote:
> >
> >>># make by itself or make all compiles everything, modules included
> >>>if make -j3 all modules_install
> >>
> >>thanks.
> >>
> >>I noticed that under Novell SuSe 9.1, I must run mkinitrd after building
> >>the kernel or the system would have a kernel panic during boot-up. Is it
> >>reallky mandatory for 2.6 kernel?
> >
> >
> >Yes, if you have modules on the file system that the kernel needs to
> >boot, like file system or SCSI support. It's rather difficult to boot
> >from, say, an XFS file system if your kernel does not have XFS file
> >system support built-in *and* the initrd does not have an XFS module. ;-)
>
> That's not true. I never use an initrd, and boot XFS filesystems all
> the time.
That's a heckuva trick, booting from a file system your kernel doesn't
support. How does the kernel know how to read the file system to mount
root, then? Sure, you can boot the kernel, but it will panic because
it can't mount the RFS. So, you either have to have XFS support compiled
into the kernel (what I do here) or it has to live in an initrd.
Kurt
--
You will be surprised by a loud noise.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list