<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">Thanks for the summary JC. Very clear. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">See you next Monday.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Ann Romeo<br>Personal email: <a href="mailto:annromeo@gmail.com" target="_blank">annromeo@gmail.com</a></div>
<div>Local home: 206-526-0871<br>Work email: <a href="mailto:Ann.Romeo@ORCInternational.com" target="_blank">Ann.Romeo@ORCInternational.com</a></div>
<div>Work direct dial: 212-463-6331</div><div>My cell: 425-615-1413 (text ok)</div><div> </div><div><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color:rgb(153,51,102);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"></span> </p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color:rgb(153,51,102);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"> </span></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><i><span style="color:rgb(153,204,0);letter-spacing:-1pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:18pt"></span></i><b><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:18pt"></span></b> </p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font></div><div> </div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:11 PM, JC Chupack <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jc.chupack@gmail.com" target="_blank">jc.chupack@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi all,<br><br></div>One of the agenda items for our upcoming Sept board meeting is regarding proposals that came up at the August meeting to consider modifying our "daylight" tournament schedules. There were two separate proposals that I'll summarize below, both of which had some discussion at the last meeting.<br><br>If you won't be at the September meeting and have thoughts to share, please send them over in advance so that we can consider before potentially taking a vote at the Sept board meeting. Otherwise, this is mainly to ensure we're all on the same page for the next meeting.<br><br></div><b>Proposal 1 - Change the Friday schedule for our "daylight" tournaments (Sweetheart & Suntan) to also be on daylight hours (10:30 & 3:30 session starts)<br></b></div><ul><li>Why make this change: trying to turn over the venue from a late evening session to early morning Saturday is challenging for all involved as well as for player attendance. Creates consistency for these tournaments.<br></li><li>Some arguments against: eliminates "working" players ability to attend Friday, setup on Friday morning would start very early</li><li>To be discussed: would we keep IMP pairs and BAM teams on the Friday 2nd session schedule if we made this change?<br></li></ul></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Proposal 2 - For our "daylight" tournaments (Sweetheart & Suntan), change the Friday evening event(s) to Fast Pairs only.</b> (If proposal 1 is accepted, this would be a third session on Friday only. If proposal 1 is not accepted, the goal would be to alleviate the turnover issue without shifting the 1pm session start time.)<br><ul><li>Why make this change: If proposal 1 is accepted, this would allow us to accommodate working players with a session while getting folks out early enough for a 10:30 Saturday start to be feasible. Even if proposal 1 is not accepted, this would help alleviate the turnover issue for these sectionals.<br></li><li>Some arguments against if Proposal 1 is accepted: adding a third session increases directorial complexity and noise in venue during the last few rounds of the 3:30 session. Also, we would expect this to be low attendance. Is it worth the effort?<br></li><li>To be discussed: fast pairs may be too challenging for limited event players. So, if we did this, would we eliminate limited events for this session? If we don't, the benefit goes away. <br></li></ul></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br></div><div>JC<br></div><div><div><b></b><div><div><div><div><div class="m_-3410902985682632097gmail_signature"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">--<font size="1"><font style="font-family:arial;font-size:small" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br><span style="font-family:arial"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:x-small">JC Chupack</span></font></span></font><div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:x-small">* Find me on Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, or Twitter: jcchupack</span></font></span></font></div></font></font></div></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Sbuboard mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sbuboard@mailman.celestial.com">Sbuboard@mailman.celestial.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.celestial.com/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/sbuboard</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>