[SBU Board] STAC vs MUG

[Eric Sieg]

Okay, I'll convey this opinion to EBC. Thanks!

Eric

Raymond Miller wrote:
> I agree with Mike.  One of the objectives of returning the unit games 
> to the clubs was to improve relationships with the Board and the 
> clubs.  If we dictate to Eastside that they cannot hold a stack, when 
> they think it is in their best interest to hold one, then we will 
> certainly not be helping the club.
>
> Ray
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Mike Christensen 
> <quirk_1 at hotmail.com <mailto:quirk_1 at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I vote that we are happy to support what ever decision Eastside
>     would like to do.
>
>
>     On a personal note, I like STAC games, but appreciate that they
>     are near pointless at clubs like Mercercrest, due to the
>     difficulty in getting into the overalls at a tougher club than the
>     average STAC game.
>
>
>     Cheers,
>     Mike
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Sbuboard
>     <sbuboard-bounces+quirk_1=hotmail.com at mailman.celestial.com
>     <mailto:hotmail.com at mailman.celestial.com>> on behalf of William
>     Campbell <jwccsllc at me.com <mailto:jwccsllc at me.com>>
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:04 AM
>     *To:* Seattle ACBL Unit Board
>     *Subject:* Re: [SBU Board] STAC vs MUG
>
>     On Apr 25, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Eric Sieg <easieg at gmail.com
>     <mailto:easieg at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > My concern was that we (the board) advertised one thing and then
>     members who show up are going to get something different.
>
>     Good point, but how many people know the board advertised it that way?
>
>     >
>     > Other game owners (Mercercrest especially) have mentioned that
>     they get lots of complaints about STAC games and don't hold them
>     as a result. My concern is that those who complain are now going
>     to get blindsided.
>
>     Mercercrest probably is the exception as very few of the players
>     in that game have any need for silver points.
>
>     Based on the attendance at Eastside's Friday game, the 199ers
>     section is almost always larger then the Open.  I don't know how
>     many of the 199ers there are seriously trying to make LM though. 
>     Quite a few of them were 199ers when I started playing duplicate
>     again in 2009.
>
>     Of the 1,103 members in Unit 446 having any Masterpoints 704 have
>     fewer than 500, and 510 have fewer than 200 (numbers from the
>     coloradospringsbridge.com <http://coloradospringsbridge.com> site).
>
>     Bill
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sbuboard mailing list
>     Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com <mailto:Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com>
>     https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.celestial.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsbuboard&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca47646911e61418afb6f08d5aad71941%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636602763168535682&sdata=iF%2B8IcSLijn6rXhSEe4PpSzrLhB5G6qOkYHvk7VHu%2Bs%3D&reserved=0
>     <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.celestial.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsbuboard&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca47646911e61418afb6f08d5aad71941%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636602763168535682&sdata=iF%2B8IcSLijn6rXhSEe4PpSzrLhB5G6qOkYHvk7VHu%2Bs%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sbuboard mailing list
>     Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com <mailto:Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com>
>     http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>     <http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sbuboard mailing list
> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20180425/49c51881/attachment.html>