[SBU Board] Sweetheart Sectional Postmortem notes

Ann Romeo annromeo at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 17:13:26 PST 2017


One more idea/thing that may help a LOT with coffee (and running out)
Let's invest in two thermos despensers--they cost a bit, BUT can hold over
3 pots of coffee.  That should solve running out.  We had access to these
at Renton CC--they were WONDERFUL--I can make a couple pots ahead and store
in thermos, and they stayed toasty hot.​  See what I see on Amazon.com?

[image: Inline image 1]

cheers,

a

Ann Romeo
Personal email: annromeo at gmail.com
Local home: 425-392-8417
Work email: Ann.Romeo at ORCInternational.com
Work direct dial: 212-463-6331
My cell: 425-615-1413 (text ok)









On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Ann Romeo <annromeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> My weigh-in (I'm away until Tuesday, and don't think calling in makes
> sense at Starbucks...)
>
> A cart is a great idea--sometimes venues have these, and they may our
> lives a lot easier (think Vasa).  However, there will always be schlepping
> --as coffee needs to be dumped and baskets need to be rinsed before fresh
> pots are made.  We may want to have a 5 gallon slop bucket, but actually I
> think some of this needs to be done away from the maddening crowds, for
> both safety and aesthetics....  BUT using a combo of water pitcher/jugs and
> a cart will make a lot of this a lot easier.  All comes down to room in the
> trailer.​
>
> Single session for everything?  I wonder?  For A events, eg, open pairs,
> there may be more people getting awards, but certainly the value goes
> down.  I wonder if we can't make a compromise and make open events 2
> session events,  and bcd single session (but I'm not sure if that is better
> for things like gold rush pairs, where bigger points are awarded for pairs
> that can put together a good day's worth of bridge).  I have a feeling that
> A players want the bigger pay offs (and if we're going to make a blanket
> change, I think we need to poll specifically As to see).  Just my
> thoughts....I'll never forget one time doing well in both sessions of an
> open and number of points awarded for me and my partner's
> efforts--glorious.....
>
>
> Lunch breaks are long for those who finish fast, and sometimes too short
> for those who don't.  I've been in both situations.
>
> I like the idea of encouraging people to bring their lunch from home--but
> we also need to stress, NO REFRIGERATION, so that people don't expect us to
> store their food (this happens pretty near every time, btw--people want to
> store food, and take ice...)....
>
> And I can always use some help.  hiring someone makes sense.  Sometimes
> we've been lucky and I've been able to enlist the aid of Jenny Ballantyne
> and/or Dee Patrick.  But here's something key--strength and size matters.
> There was a time caddies (especially Laurie's son) was able to help and was
> perfect, but them days are long gone.  Let's talk about this when I'm
> back...
>
> I LOVE the idea of fast pairs on Friday when we have a 7ish start (and
> recommend 7:15 start,btw), and the next day a 10:30 start.  LOVE LOVE LOVE
> IT, and suspect it will be VERY popular.  Did I say I love fast pairs when
> we have an early start the next day??
>
> And as to the start times, I heard comments, both pro and con.  Personally
> I am all for a 10:30 start--it allows me to eat dinner at a decent hour and
> get a good night sleep.  BUT, I would want a shorter break between the two
> sessions.  I think we're trainable, and this could work.
>
> all for now
> from sunny Palm Springs
> romeo
>
> Ann Romeo
> Personal email: annromeo at gmail.com
> Local home: 425-392-8417 <(425)%20392-8417>
> Work email: Ann.Romeo at ORCInternational.com
> Work direct dial: 212-463-6331 <(212)%20463-6331>
> My cell: 425-615-1413 <(425)%20615-1413> (text ok)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:04 PM, JC Chupack <jc.chupack at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We can discuss/review briefly at the board meeting, but I'm sending out
>> in advance for anyone not attending.  I highlighted key items that the
>> board should weigh in on and possibly vote on during the meeting, since
>> this is long. Also, I incorporated Jenni's feedback into my notes below.  I
>> pretty much agree with everything she mentioned, but I tried to make clear
>> what was hers vs. mine.
>>
>> I am planning to do a post-sectional survey to all the players that
>> attended to ask for general feedback and to possibly ask a few specific
>> questions for this event.  If you have things you'd like me to ask, let me
>> know.
>>
>> ======================
>>
>> Pre-event:
>>
>>    - Planning - we needed more bridgemates than planned for this. Unsure
>>    of details of what happened here.
>>    - Boards need to be made for 1-36. Remind Sharon and Nick when boards
>>    are being duplicated.
>>    - Print signs for the fee schedule and post them prominently - it'll
>>    save a lot of repeating info to those buying
>>    - Chairs should write up and print out announcements for them and for
>>    the directors (they can always be edited onsite) - see announcements section
>>
>>
>>
>> Setup:
>>
>>    - Entry-buying table would be better off near the entrance to the
>>    site.  (Suggest we set up two entry-buying tables near the front, in
>>    the nooks between the doors. When there's a rush, there can be separate
>>    tables per event/strat.) When lines formed on Saturday, it was tough to get
>>    to the nearby tables, and we had spills happen because tables got knocked.
>>    - The offset nook where partnership, entries, and the loading dock
>>    are should be used for additional tables for May.  We had to set up
>>    one extra table during this event; I expect May will be as big, if not
>>    bigger, so we'll need that space for more gaming tables.
>>    - In addition to taking pictures of the initial setup that we will
>>    need to reset to, note how many tables, chairs, rows, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> Announcements:
>>
>>    - Remember to turn on all the volume switches for announcements.  After
>>    that, it's a simple on/off (allow 30s to let the mic warm up).
>>    - Chair should write up "last round" announcement items to ask the
>>    directors to include at end of each session - start time of next session,
>>    start time of next day's session, etc.
>>    - At end of Saturday 2nd session, ask everyone to please rotate their
>>    playing table 45 degrees before they leave. It'll save a lot of time on Sat
>>    evening.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hospitality:
>>
>>    - Since we don't have a big sink or kitchen for this site, and we
>>    intend to keep using this site, I recommend that we plan on buying and
>>    bringing several gallon jugs of water and refilling those rather than
>>    hauling the coffee urns back and forth.  Also, we should get a
>>    hospitality cart to be used throughout the weekend (table height cart) to
>>    minimize lifting needs/strain.
>>    - We might be getting to the size point that we should consider
>>    hiring someone to be a hospitality assistant during sessions. Given minimum
>>    wage, I'd figure this is around $100-$125 per day, but coffee runs out
>>    mid-session, snacks need to be restocked, areas need to be picked up and
>>    cleaned up, wiped down, tidied…I imagine we could keep a person busy.
>>    The only question is if we're willing to make this investment/risk.  I
>>    do not think it's the right thing to do to get volunteers to sit out
>>    sessions to make this happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> Event times/timing:
>>
>>    - I heard lots of good feedback on the start times (though this is
>>    self-fulfilling).  The only negative I heard was that Friday night's
>>    session goes late and then Sat AM starts early the next morning.  (This was
>>    toughest on the folks having to close down on Friday evening.)
>>    - *Jenni noted (and I agree) that we should shift to a shorter Swiss
>>    on Sunday. We both heard complaints about 56 boards being used, that it was
>>    "too much bridge" and "too long of a day."  *I intend to ask about
>>    this in a post-event survey to get data, but while I know some A players
>>    like 56 boards, it does not work well to have A on a different timing than
>>    everyone else, for carpooling and noise levels.  And many A as well
>>    as BCD players do not prefer that many boards.
>>    - Jenni noted (and I agree) that 1hr15 was too long for a lunch on
>>    Sunday at this location. There's plenty of nearby fast food.  I know
>>    my group dawdled a bit (so I could do things), then drove 1.5mi away, ate
>>    lunch, and then had plenty of time to go shopping and have a brief walk
>>    while still arriving in plenty of time to play.
>>       - For Forest Ridge, we will either need to provide the extra time
>>       or just recommend everyone bring a sack lunch.  It is much slower
>>       to get in and out of that site, and we don't want bridge players speeding
>>       through that neighborhood or parking illegally to make it back.
>>
>>
>>
>> Event formats:
>>
>>    - The 0-750 was a big hit. I think it drove the additional attendance
>>    we got. Likewise, there was appreciation for the 0-2500.  A daylight
>>    timed event will get the attendance to have these breakouts, I think.
>>    (Friday evening was the only session that we were a little light to
>>    have the events we had.)
>>    - *Jenni and I both heard negative feedback about the BAM being the
>>    only event for open players on Friday evening.*  The turnout for it
>>    was also lower this year than in previous years, and we both believe that
>>    players are voting with their feet, which may have led to Friday night's
>>    light attendance (plus the timing).  At the tournaments committee, we
>>    discussed this because the survey data indicated that the BAM was the only
>>    event type we offer that had a negative rating, and the concern with
>>    offering another open event opposite it is that the BAM won't run in that
>>    case.  In my opinion, we have enough data between the survey and
>>    on-site to *remove the Friday night BAM and replace with an open or
>>    fast pairs (fast because of the Sat AM start time).*  (Note that we
>>    offer a BAM on the Monday of the KO sectional, so it's not like we won't
>>    offer the format any more, and we can see after that event if we get
>>    similar negative feedback or if it was just the Friday night that was
>>    troublesome.)
>>    - *Jenni recommended that when we have a 0-2500, we adjust strata to
>>    0-3000, 3000-5000, and 5000+ for the Open event.*  (Note that, per
>>    our voting last year, the board agreed to revise strata based on tournament
>>    data after each tournament. Tournament data is still pending, but I trust
>>    Jenni's input here as a tentative agreement.)
>>    - *Jenni recommended (and I agree) that we should shift to single
>>    session events, because they pay more MP and players tend to be happier
>>    with them for scheduling and performance.*  We got several queries
>>    pre-event about single session entries (which we're required to accept, but
>>    it's not obvious that's the case when it's a 2-session event…I didn't even
>>    know that until doing this!). I submitted a summary to the board last month
>>    about proposing we eliminate 2 session pairs events that I'll bring to the
>>    3/6 meeting and have attached to this for reference.
>>
>>
>>
>> Publicity:
>>
>>    - Pre-event publicity seemed to work fine given attendance. Note that
>>    we did not have this flyer at the previous sectional due to the site change.
>>    - Enthusiasm for photos (aside from awards) was mixed.
>>    - If we do want to keep pushing session winner photos, I would like
>>    us to get a banner to use as a backdrop for photos, but this is very much a
>>    "nice to have".  It'd be ~$250, high quality and re-usable (and packs
>>    down small), and I'd have it printed with our Seattle logo alternating with
>>    either the ACBL logo or with text for "Seattle Unit 446" or similar.  If
>>    someone crafty wants to volunteer to make one, I'm all for that, too.
>>    - Roving photography would be nice to use for publicizing our events,
>>    but obviously, anyone who volunteered would be playing.
>>    - I think the big board was nice. Curious for others' thoughts on it.
>>    We won't need as many "slots" if we don't post award winners (but we
>>    could just keep the awards winners displayed all year, which is kind of a
>>    cool thing…or we could replace with thank yous to volunteers or other
>>    things we want to publicize)
>>
>>
>>
>> Equipment notes:
>>
>>    - *Jenni recommmended we get laminated placards or stands with the
>>    section letters to show where posted results are.*
>>    - *Hospitality cart (see hospitality section)*
>>    - *Tables - we may need more folding tables?*
>>
>>
>>
>> Teardown:
>>
>>    - We had good help this year and it took just over an hour to tear
>>    down. No big feedback items here. I think it went very well.
>>
>> --
>> JC Chupack
>> * Find me on Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, or Twitter: jcchupack
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sbuboard mailing list
>> Sbuboard at mailman.celestial.com
>> http://mailman.celestial.com/mailman/listinfo/sbuboard
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20170304/b20db5c6/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 35793 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/sbuboard/attachments/20170304/b20db5c6/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Sbuboard mailing list