<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Terence <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:terence.john@gmail.com">terence.john@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2008/8/22 Lonni J Friedman <<a href="mailto:netllama@gmail.com">netllama@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> Years ago, yes. These days 99% of the development is done by Redhat & friends.<br>
><br>
</div>Isn't the point that the original NSA version was released under the<br>
normal licence, together with the source code, was open?<br>
<br>
We can check the code.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Terence<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>Actually, my point in bringing the NSA up was that it explains why SE Linux may be overkill for home use.<br>
<br>Andrew<br></div>