fyi: all-in-one, postscript printer
C M Reinehr
cmr at amsent.com
Fri Feb 17 08:17:04 PST 2012
On Fri 17 February 2012 09:42:43 am Andrew Gould wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Man-wai Chang <mwchang at hkbn.net> wrote:
> >> Finding a good printer was a real struggle while using FreeBSD (which
> >> is now a moot point). However, I found an all-in-one, postscript
> >> printer that's still commonly available. Lexmark's Pro915 speaks
> >> postscript, so I was able to configure it as a generic postscript
> >> printer using CUPS.
> >
> > There should be postscript software drivers that decipher postscript
> > input into codes for non-postscript printers?
> >
> > --
>
> Until recently, I was running FreeBSD, where printer drivers are
> problematic. The ability of a printer to speak postscript simplifies
> the situation greatly. CUPS handles this printer fine using the
> generic postscript driver.
>
> I wasn't able to scan from the device over the network, but that's
> also true for all of the computers/operating systems in the house.
> I've been told that network printing/scanning is often problematic
> when an ATT U-verse router is in the way. At least printing is
> working. I can scan to a USB thumb drive as a scanning work-around.
>
> Andrew
Andrew,
Strictly speaking, a linux system does needs no "drivers" to communicate with
a postscript printer. AFAIK all free applications generate output either in
plain text or in postscript, both of which can be sent directly to the
printer. All CUPS needs is a description of the printer -- a PPD file -- which
I generally rob from a M$ Windows driver package. You can fancy-up your plain
text output by running it through enscript before sending it to the printer,
which will convert it into postscript.
HTH
cmr
--
Debian 'Lenny' - Registered Linux User #241964
--------
"More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list