Format whole drive vs. partition
Michael Hipp
michael at redmule.com
Sat Dec 29 11:01:37 PST 2012
On 12/29/2012 12:53 PM, Dan Martin wrote:
> In that case, my only concern would be the lack of
> a swap partition on the secondary drive. But, like what prompted
> your original question, this is something that I've read, but that I don't
> really understand--that is, how/why would a swap partition on each
> physical drive improve performance.
It's not something I ever give much thought to as my little systems basically
never use much swap, but...
If you're using a lot of swap, having it spread across more spindles/channels
could certainly speed things up, but it would be usage dependent. I'd think
swap should be on the least busy drive which often would be the primary root
drive, not the bulk data drives.
But having swap spread around to more drives also makes it prone to more
failures, so I'd be careful of that.
Michael
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list