routing table madness
Lonni J Friedman
netllama at gmail.com
Wed Nov 25 09:51:23 PST 2009
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Tony Alfrey <tonyalfrey at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Lonni J Friedman wrote:
>>
>> I've got an entry in the routing table that conflicts with another
>> entry that I use to connect to my employer's VPN (using vpnc). I'd
>> like to delete the route, but no matter what I do, it doesn't work.
>> First, here's 'route -n' output:
>>
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>> Iface
>> 172.16.217.26 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
>> tun0
>> 216.228.112.12 10.0.2.2 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0
>> eth0
>> 172.16.229.26 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
>> tun0
>> 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>> eth0
>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0
>> eth0
>> 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.240.0.0 U 0 0 0
>> tun0
>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
>> tun0
>> 0.0.0.0 10.0.2.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
>> eth0
>>
>> The route that I'd like to delete from above is:
>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
>> tun0
>>
>> Unfortunately, when I attempt to delete the '10.0.0.0 tun0' route, it
>> fails to work:
>> # route del 10.0.0.0
>> SIOCDELRT: No such process
>>
>> Similarly:
>> # ip route del 10.0.0.0
>> RTNETLINK answers: No such process
>>
>>
>> Surely I'm doing something wrong here, but I can't figure out what
>> after googling for a while.
>>
>
>
> I don't know much about this stuff, but on my network, 10.0.0.0 or 10.0.0.1,
> etc are ip addresses assigned by NAT, so they are only temporarily assigned.
> So maybe that's why route del can't delete them? Is that total bullshit?
Yes, that's total bullshit. thanks though.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama at gmail.com
LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list