purty colors
Collins Richey
crichey at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 08:22:21 PST 2008
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:57 PM, David A. Bandel
<david.bandel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 8:01 AM, Jerry McBride <mcbrides9 at comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2008 12:10:56 am Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> > > http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=240
> >
> > That is just plain wrong... There are some really sick people out
> > there.... :')
> >
> > On the serious side though... I don't see one single label any where... could
> > you imagine tracking a failure?
>
> yep. don't need labels (which fall off over time) if you use a simple
> database. Switch #/port # connects to: socket #/office #/floor # or
> other switch#/port# (and you know where the switches are because their
> numbers tell you).
>
> I also have a database of systems/MAC/IP(or dhcp) and I know who
> "owns" what. So even traffic is easy to identify by who it is.
>
> Makes tracking down problems super easy.
>
Yep, we're in the process of doing that very thing at work, at long
last. Up to 300 plus offices and cubicles and 500+ PCs and dozens of
switches. The inventory and database will be a real time saver.
--
Collins Richey
If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries
of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list