Sidux stability?

[Lonni J Friedman]

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Michael Hipp <Michael at hipp.com> wrote:
>  >  > Collins Richey wrote:
>  >  >  > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com> wrote:
>  >  >  >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Collins Richey wrote:
>  >  >  >>
>  >  >  >>  [mondo snippage]
>  >  >  >>
>  >  >  >>
>  >  >  >>  > One final comment, nothing is quite so unstable as a Ubuntu
>  >  >  >>  > development release. They don't test squat before releasing it.
>  >  >  >>
>  >  >  >>  This would be why it's called a "development release," yes?
>  >  >  >>
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Sure, but the Ubuntu concept of development is to dump anything they
>  >  >  > find into the repositories, even if it is rife with unmet
>  >  >  > dependancies, ie no one has ever even bothered to istall the crap.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Um. I doubt this statement would stand up to an objective test of the facts.
>  >
>  >  I find it hilarious how Collins' tune has changed now that he's found
>  >  a new distro of the month.  First it was Caldera long ago, then he
>  >  discovered Gentoo (and couldn't stop singing its praises, and getting
>  >  horribly offended if not everyone agreed), then it was Ubuntu was the
>  >  best thing since sliced bread, and now its Sidux. Just wait a few
>  >  months and I'm sure that Collins will despise Sidux, and find some new
>  >  shiny object to capture his heart & attention.

Best post evar.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama at gmail.com
LlamaLand                       https://netllama.linux-sxs.org