Sidux stability?

[Lonni J Friedman]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Michael Hipp <Michael at hipp.com> wrote:
> Collins Richey wrote:
>  > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com> wrote:
>  >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:21:05PM -0700, Collins Richey wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  [mondo snippage]
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  > One final comment, nothing is quite so unstable as a Ubuntu
>  >>  > development release. They don't test squat before releasing it.
>  >>
>  >>  This would be why it's called a "development release," yes?
>  >>
>  >
>  > Sure, but the Ubuntu concept of development is to dump anything they
>  > find into the repositories, even if it is rife with unmet
>  > dependancies, ie no one has ever even bothered to istall the crap.
>
>  Um. I doubt this statement would stand up to an objective test of the facts.

I find it hilarious how Collins' tune has changed now that he's found
a new distro of the month.  First it was Caldera long ago, then he
discovered Gentoo (and couldn't stop singing its praises, and getting
horribly offended if not everyone agreed), then it was Ubuntu was the
best thing since sliced bread, and now its Sidux. Just wait a few
months and I'm sure that Collins will despise Sidux, and find some new
shiny object to capture his heart & attention.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama at gmail.com
LlamaLand                       https://netllama.linux-sxs.org