Fedora 10

[James McDonald]

On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:47 -0800, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Fedora 10 isn't bad.
> 
> NetworkManager, on the other hand, is a steaming turd. It would take
> some effort, but I'm sure if the GNOME developers work hard enough,
> they can make NetworkManager completely incapable of customization
> or end-user configuration.

I thought it was simply Ubuntu stuffing up NM that was causing me issues
with building VPN's but having just tried the same thing with F10 I
think it's NM that's the issue.

What I'm suprised about is how something so critical to the
distribution/s is simply not working properly.... and being included by
them.

I wonder if they are using the old MS tactic. We don't have a good
product now but stick with us because the next release will... FUD.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.celestial.com/pipermail/linux-users/attachments/20081206/c0c51c15/attachment-0002.bin