Machiel Richards

David Bandel david.bandel
Tue Jul 3 11:26:15 PDT 2007


On 7/3/07, Roger Oberholtzer <roger at opq.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 09:17 -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Machiel Richards wrote:
> > >> *** Disclaimer ***
> > >>
> > >> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and legally
> > >> privileged and is intended solely for the addressee and to others who have
> > >> the authority to receive it. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is
> > >> unauthorized and as such, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
> > >> action taken or omitted in reliance on it is unlawful. If you have received
> > >> this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> > >>
> > >> The views expressed in this e-mail are the views of the individual sender
> > >> and should in no way be construed as the views of the Company.
> > >>
> > >> The Company is not liable to ensure that outgoing e-mails are virus-free.
> > >>
> > >> The Company is not liable, should information or data, for whatever reason,
> > >> be corrupted or fail to reach its intended addressee.
> > >>
> > >> The Company is not liable for any loss or damage of whatsoever nature and
> > >> howsoever arising resulting from the opening or the use of the information
> > >> in this e-mail, including its attachments and links.
> > >>
> > >> The sender of this e-mail is subject to and bound by the terms and
> > >> conditions of Company??s Electronic Communications Usage Policy.
> > >


I just wish I could convince someone to actually try to sue or
otherwise hold this one-sided non-contractually binding stupidity
against me.  But even though the moron lawyers write it, no one seems
bold enough to try to enforce it.

Please tell your legal staff I've posted this drivel on a web site in
contravention of their confidentiality policy as well as sent it on to
their competition.  I would want everyone to keep this confidential
too as just shows the lawyers who've written this have _no_ legal
concept of the public nature of non-encrypted e-mails and should be
ashamed to call themselves lawyers.  Too bad lawyers can't be
disbarred for practicing law when they obviously know nothing about
it.

Please forward this to your legal department.

Thanx,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
            - Nemesis Air Racing Team motto




More information about the Linux-users mailing list