NVidia Debian thread

[Net Llama!]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, C M Reinehr wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 10:08, Net Llama! wrote:
>>
>> But we're not talking about UNixes, we're talking about Linux, and Debian
>> is the only one that effectively ignores the entire runlevel concept for
>> no apparent reason.
>
> 	I wouldn't say that it ignores run levels, just that it has a slightly
> different way of organizing them (as it does many other facets of Linux). Run
> level 0 = full stop, run level 1 = single user, run level 2 = multi-user &
> run level 6 = reboot. IANAE but I think the only real difference, here, is
> that using run levels of 3, 4 or 5 is left to the discretion of the user.
> IIRC this is quite similar to COL except that COL didn't start the X-server
> until run level 3 or 4, but I could be mistaken.

I'm pretty sure that Caldera started X in runlevel 5.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama at linux-sxs.org
LlamaLand				http://netllama.linux-sxs.org