posting speed

[Tony Alfrey]

David Bandel wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Dominic Lepiane <archangel at nibble.bz> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 September 2006 14:53, Tony Alfrey wrote:
>>> Bill Campbell wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Check the Received: headers in the messages that are slow to see
>>>> where the delay occurs.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> So clearly the processing delay is in the list.  So, what gives?  What's the
>> big delay?
>>
> 
> So many questions, so little time:
> 
> Let's see, my read of the RFCs is that e-mail is "best effort", not least delay.

Oh, Ronnie G. got it "spot on" I think those Aussies say.    ;-))


-- 
Tony Alfrey
tonyalfrey at earthlink.net
"I'd Rather Be Sailing"