FC5

[Alma J Wetzker]

Rick Sivernell wrote:
> 
> [root at RSivernell ~]# route add 192.168.0.1 eth1
> [root at RSivernell ~]# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth1
> 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.0.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
> [root at RSivernell ~]# ping 192.168.0.1
> PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>From 192.168.0.60 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>>From 192.168.0.60 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>>From 192.168.0.60 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
> 
> --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
> 7 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 6000ms
> , pipe 3
> [root at RSivernell ~]# ifconfig
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:11:2F:7F:17:EC
>           inet addr:192.168.0.60  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::211:2fff:fe7f:17ec/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:1077 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:3
>           TX packets:359 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:216206 (211.1 KiB)  TX bytes:17349 (16.9 KiB)
>           Interrupt:17 Base address:0x6000
> 
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:1359 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:1359 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:2214129 (2.1 MiB)  TX bytes:2214129 (2.1 MiB)
> 
> [root at RSivernell ~]#
> 
> Looks like the built-in nic is bad. This should be working. I will
> put in a old drive in this box and install M# xp pro, to test the nic.
> 
Wouldn't knoppix be easier?

     -- Alma