Debian / Ubuntu conf.d crazy
James McDonald
james
Sat Jun 3 22:56:51 PDT 2006
I made a small boo boo the other night when trying to increase the size
of a logical volume to include the old windows xp partition I no longer needed to refer to.
Needless to say I have had to completely rebuild the box... sigh.
Anyway I thought why not try Ubuntu for a while since I have become such
a RH/Fedora devotee that I wouldn't mind seeing how the other half live,
so to speak.
Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper is a good operating system from my view point. It
appears to have a greater selection of packages than FC5 by default and
I much prefer apt to the "Yee UltraLongTimeToInstallAnything Package
Manager"
However the Debian roots of the systems means the config files for a
package are split into half a dozen files located in a conf.d directory.
This is annoying! By the time one has fgrepped to find the correct file
to edit one thinks that a monolithic conf file would have been much
easier to maintain. In the process of debianizing a package I found
missing configuration variables that only existed in the samples located
in /usr/share/doc/<packagename>
I am talking about /etc/apache2 and /etc/amavis as examples...
There are advantages to splitting your conf files up I suppose but right
now I can't think of many
>From a system administration point of view I think RH/Fedora is
providing a more unified set of tools. chkconfig seems to be a bit less
obscure to use than update-rc.d.
I think in another few months I will be acclimatized and will probably
be happy with either but the first few nights trying to get back everything
one had is a learning curve.
--
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list