terminal emulator

[Alma J Wetzker]

Rick Sivernell wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:07:07 -0500
[snip round and round we go]
> 
> 
> Kurt
> 
>   Ok, I now understand the statement. I would agree on that, except that some of the
> code is hard to understand as it canbe cryptic at times. Not well documented. Nor
> written as I would have wrote it. But that does not mean badly written code either.
> Just I may have laid it out differently. 
> 

Spend some time working through the code, reformat as you go.  By the 
time you have it all in the layout that you like best, you will have a 
pretty clear understanding about what each part does.  (At least you 
will know what parts to change for what you want to do.)

     -- Alma