SCSI disk opinions

Tony Alfrey tonyalfrey
Tue Oct 18 09:31:13 PDT 2005


A. Khattri wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Net Llama! wrote:
> 
> 
>>Since we're bashing, also avoid Hitachi.  While their SCSI drive
>>reliability wasn't bad, their RMA policy is draconian and insulting.
> 
> 
> Just in case you didn't know - Hitachi bought IBM's storage business so
> their disks are based on the "Deathstar" ones...
> 
> 

and I have Seagate SCSI drives.  They are not cheap, but one day when I 
had to replace one that had gone south after a year or two, and I 
casually called them up to see about specs or some such thing, the 
person on the other end took the serial number off the drive, told me 
that the drive was still under warranty, told me to stick it in a box 
and send it back for a replacement.  I think that they even sent me some 
sort of RMA label by e-mail to stick on the box.  So needless to say, I 
am happy with Seagate drives.


-- 
Tony Alfrey
tonyalfrey at earthlink.net
"I'd Rather Be Sailing"


More information about the Linux-users mailing list