<semi-OT> Tension mounts between OpenSolaris derivatives

[Kurt Wall]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:20:40PM -0700, Bill Campbell took 0 lines to write:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005, Net Llama! wrote:
> >On 06/29/2005 06:55 PM, Kurt Wall wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:40:20PM -0700, Net Llama! took 0 lines to write:
> >>>Distro wars, the sequel:
> >>>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/0,2000061733,39199260,00.htm
> >>
> >>This is the Unix wars all over again, but with an ironic twist. 
> >>Seems someone (*cough*Schilling*cough*) didn't learn anything the
> >>first time. ;-)
> >>
> >>Kurt
> >
> >If it destroys both Sun & Schilling in the process, I'll be quite pleased.
> 
> Tom Yager had an interesting article on this in the current Infoworld.
> 
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/06/22/26OPcurve_1.html

I suppose it was interesting in that it was another screed predicting
Linux's certain demise. But the article is predicated on the assumption
that Open Solaris is actually "open" when, from what I can tell, the
openness is all from the outside in.

Kurt
-- 
Hummingbirds never remember the words to songs.