LibraNet & Ubuntu

[Leon Goldstein]

Bob Hemus wrote

>I broke in on Caldera 1.3 and stayed with 'em 'til e Desktop 2.4.  For
>me they were real easy and intuitive.  When they went belly up I tried
>RH 7.0, 7.3, 9.0 the Suse 9.0 and finally had my Grandson download
>LibraNet 2.8.1 for me.  I really liked it. It seemed to be more as eD2.4
>than anything else I tried.  
>
>Then I got some of the first free Ubuntu disks, and sorta liked it, but
>while I was at my daughter's place and downloaded the Ubuntu distro with
>the 2.6.10 kernel.  It is really neat for a klutz.  Recognizes my
>camera, burns cds and dvds (not sure about plurals in abbreviations,
>know it's is it is, and it's can be possesive?).
>
>I don't know if it's the 2.6 kernel or what, but it works well
>Bob
>
>
>
>  
>
Re:

>It seemed to be more as eD2.4
>than anything else I tried.  
>
That was what kept my interest in Libranet when I installed Lib 1.9.0; 
that was my impression too.
Try recompiling the kernel; you can, for example, configure the kernel 
for your specific CPU rather than the default.
Once you do a Libranet kernel recompile using Adminmenu, you will see 
one big reason Libranet has a loyal following.

(I'm sure Ken Moffat will be along shortly with more to say on the 
subject :-)  )

-- 
Leon A. Goldstein

Powered by Libranet 2.8.1 Debian Linux
System G2