kernel IO schedulers
Kurt Wall
kwall
Mon Jan 10 21:05:21 PST 2005
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 07:03:34PM -0800, Net Llama! took 56 lines to write:
> On 12/31/2004 06:01 PM, Kurt Wall wrote:
[I/O schedulers to and fro]
> No, i did not. However i rebuilt 2.6.10 with only CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
> and confirmed in dmesg:
> elevator: using anticipatory as default io scheduler
>
> yet performance still sucketh.
I've been paying more attention to the scheduler. I got slightly better
performance with the CFQ scheduler compared to the deadline scheduler,
but it was only a few percent at most, so I've stuck with the deadline
scheduler because I understand how it works.
> i guess this is what i get for jumping from 2.6.7 to 2.6.10 just for
> gits and shiggles. *sigh*
;-)
Kurt
--
Williams and Holland's Law:
If enough data is collected, anything may be proven by
statistical methods.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list